How much control users retain.
First, ask yourself
“Do users of your system retain meaningful control over consequential actions?”
Mission statement
🫡Ensure users delegate safely by enabling controlled system actions without loss of oversight and control.
Key heuristics → Autonomy
🚀- System behavior must support, not replace, user decision-making.
- Consequential automation must require user awareness and consent.
- Users must be able to override, pause, or modify automated processes.
- Automated activity and intent must be perceptible.
- System-initiated actions must be undoable or revisable.
- User control requirements must increase with consequence severity.
- Automation must not be enforced solely for efficiency gains.
- Users must be able to inspect and adjust persistent automation and history.
- Automation must strengthen users’ sense of control and capability.
Executive brief
☝️The system must preserve real user control over delegated actions.
Core questions → Autonomy
🤔“Which decisions are made by the user, and which by the system?”
“Can users see, understand, and control delegation?”
Focus areas
Control-first
“Can users always override the system?”
“Is delegation deliberate or implicit?”
Risk-aware
“What happens if the system is wrong?”
“Are high-risk actions ever taken without consent?”
Transparency-aware
“Are system decisions and rationale visible to the user?”
“Can users predict when and why the system will act?”
AI-aware
“Is automation advisory or authoritative?”
“Does learning expand capability without reducing user control?”
🧬 UX directives → Autonomy
Directive43/01
Design system behavior to preserve human agency.
Ensure automation supports rather than replaces user decision-making.
Directive43/02
Require explicit delegation of automated behavior.
Do not perform consequential automation without user awareness and consent.
Directive43/03
Provide meaningful intervention mechanisms.
Enable users to override, pause, or modify automated processes.
Directive43/04
Make automated state and intent visible.
Ensure users understand what the system is doing and why.
Directive43/05
Ensure reversibility of automated outcomes.
Allow users to undo or revise system-initiated actions.
Directive43/06
Calibrate autonomy according to risk level.
Increase user control requirements as consequence severity rises.
Directive43/07
Prioritize agency over raw efficiency.
Avoid enforcing automation solely for speed gains.
Directive43/08
Preserve autonomy across time horizons.
Enable users to inspect and adjust persistent settings and historical automation.
Directive43/09
Design automation to reinforce user confidence.
Ensure system behavior strengthens users’ sense of control and capability.
Executive summary
⚡- Autonomy is preserved human agency, not unrestricted automation.
- It ensures the system supports decisions without replacing them.
- The system must require explicit delegation for consequential automated behavior.
- Automated state, intent, and outcomes must remain visible, controllable, and reversible.
- Autonomy must be calibrated to risk, increasing user control as consequence severity rises.
- Autonomy succeeds when automation strengthens users’ sense of control rather than diminishing it.
Success indicators
😎- Users remain in control of important decisions.
- Automated actions occur with user awareness or consent.
- Users can pause, modify, or override automation.
- The system clearly shows what automation is doing.
- Automated actions can be undone or corrected.
One-line summary
☝️Before users can trust a system, they must feel it acts with them, not for them.